| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Oct | ||||||
| 1 | ||||||
| 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
| 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
| 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | ||||||




It was bound to be found eventually.
Security Watch Special: Windows XP SP2 Has a Dangerous Hole
There is a lot of lore about Mac OS X being more secure because less people use it. There’s a good article that discusses why this is not correct, that Mac OS X’s UNIX underpinnings are inherently more secure.
Mind you, I am not a Mac user because I don’t like Windows or Microsoft - Microsoft is the #1 developer for the Mac platform and they do a pretty good job (except for this Word 2004 bug I am noticing, I will post on it eventually). I am a Mac user because I like Mac OS X. I don’t spend time looking for reasons for people to not use Windows. I would not like to see the Mac have a large market share, just that it survive so everyone can choose their platform. It looks like I’m safe for a while to come.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.